ReviewNutrition & metabolism2025
Probiotics and inflammatory bowel disease: an umbrella meta-analysis of relapse, recurrence, and remission outcomes.
Review in Nutrition & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gut microbiota-tryptophan metabolism-immune axis in inflammatory bowel disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Probiotics in Autoimmune Disease: Strain-specific Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Enhancing Probiotic Performance in Food Matrices: From Strain Selection to Bioengineering.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Natural Products as Nutritional Supplements in Human Disease Prevention and Management: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Nutrients · 2026Review
- State-of-the-Art Review on Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Microbial Metabolites: Molecular Mechanisms Shaping Host Immunity, Metabolic Health, and Chronic Disease Prevention.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Review
- Current Concepts in Probiotic Safety and Efficacy.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Probiotic drug interactions in ulcerative colitis: a microbiota and metabolite perspective.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- AI-Guided Multi-Omic Microbiome Modulation Improves Clinical and Inflammatory Outcomes in Refractory IBD: A Real-World Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Is Associated with Altered Colonic Mucosal Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) encompass chronic inflammatory conditions such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This umbrella meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in reducing relapse, recurrence, and maintaining remission in IBD patients.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024 for meta-analyses evaluating probiotics in IBD. A random-effects model calculated pooled effect sizes. The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests, and corrected by trim-and-fill when appropriate.
resultsTwenty meta-analyses including 46 datasets were analyzed. Probiotics significantly reduced relapse risk compared to placebo (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88), but showed no significant effect compared to mesalazine. No consistent benefit was found for remission or recurrence; however, recurrence risk was reduced after correction for publication bias (RR:0.74;95%CI:0.51-0.97, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit with lower probiotic doses (≤ 10¹⁰ Colony-Forming Units/day) and longer supplementation durations (≥ 8 weeks) regarding to relapse rate, although strain-specific effects could not be clarified.
conclusionProbiotic supplementation appears effective in reducing relapse compared to placebo, but shows no advantage over mesalazine and demonstrates benefit for recurrence only after adjusting for publication bias. These findings highlight a potential role for probiotics in IBD management, but interpretation should be cautious given the high heterogeneity and substantial overlap among included meta-analyses. Further high-quality, non-overlapping meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most effective probiotic regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.