ArticleInjury epidemiology2025
Can place of death at home be used as a proxy for suicide at home? A record linkage study.
Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate information on where suicides occur; especially in domestic settings, is essential for designing prevention programs. In practice, place of death from death certificates is used as a proxy, though its accuracy is unclear. This study assessed the validity of using death certificate data to determine place of suicide, using linked records from the Suicide Surveillance System in Taiwan.
methodsWe linked mortality data with the Suicide Surveillance System in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, from 2021 to 2023. Using the place of suicide recorded in the surveillance system as the reference standard, we estimated the proportion of suicide deaths in each place-of-death category (home, hospital, and other) that actually occurred at home.
resultsAmong 1465 suicide deaths, 965 were successfully linked to the Suicide Surveillance System. The positive predictive value for death at home was high: 99.3% for hanging, 97.8% for charcoal burning, and 100.0% for other poisoning. Many suicides recorded as hospital deaths actually occurred at home, including 79.3% of hanging, 66.7% of charcoal burning, 85.5% of other poisoning, and 71.6% of jumping cases. After adjustment, the estimated proportion of suicides occurring at home was 80.4% for hanging, 68.2% for charcoal burning, 77.9% for other poisoning, 75.0% for jumping from a height, and 60.2% for other methods.
conclusionsUsing death certificates alone underestimates suicides at home. Improved data integration is needed to support more accurate surveillance and better-targeted suicide prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.