Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029701›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2025

Discontinuing antidepressant medication: a qualitative evidence synthesis and logic model based on health professionals' views.

Loukia Christoforou, Katy Sutcliffe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Loukia Christoforou, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Katy SutcliffeInstitute of Education, EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 10 Woburn Square, London, WC1H 0NR, UK. katy.sutcliffe@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased long-term antidepressant medication (ADM) use can lead to serious psychological and physical public health implications, as well as increased financial costs and social injustice. Given that health professionals (HPs) can influence decisions on ADM discontinuation, it is imperative that to promote and enable discontinuation when the medication is no longer indicated, their perspectives around this issue are explored in depth. This systematic review of qualitative evidence aimed to identify HPs' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to ADM discontinuation / deprescribing.

methodsEligible studies were primary studies, on HPs' views on ADM discontinuation / deprescribing, that used qualitative data collection and analysis, and were published in English. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the British Journal of General Practice, the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, and Google Scholar, from July 2018 until May 2022, and harvested studies from a review published in 2019. The PubMed search was repeated post-synthesis, in January 2024, to identify and incorporate studies published since May 2022. Data was synthesised using thematic synthesis and further analysed using Bronfenbrenner's Social Ecological Model (SEM) and a logic model. One reviewer extracted data and assessed study quality, which was checked by a second reviewer. Coding and development of themes and sub-themes was undertaken by one reviewer and further developed through discussion with a second reviewer.

resultsFourteen studies were included capturing the views of over 280 HPs. The synthesis yielded eight analytical themes: Perceptions of ADM; Perceptions of Depression; Sense of Professional Duty; Confidence in Supporting ADM Discontinuation; Assessment of Patients' Circumstances and Characteristics; Assessment of Patients' Desires, Motivations and Capabilities; Systemic Healthcare Delivery Issues; and, Societal Norms and Pressures.

conclusionsUse of the SEM and development of a logic model uncovered possible pathways and underlying reasons through which factors influencing ADM discontinuation interrelate both within and across societal levels. Societal norms and pressures, and systemic healthcare delivery issues, appear to influence directly or indirectly all aspects around ADM discontinuation / deprescribing. Future research and interventions could target barriers highlighted by these two themes demonstrating the largest impact.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelDeprescriptionsHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressantsDepressionDiscontinuationHealth professionalsLogic modelQualitativeSocial ecological modelSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41029701
PMCPMC12482417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.