Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029699›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2025

Systemic versus local delivery of mesenchymal stem cells to improve the early stages of fracture healing in a polytrauma model.

Augustine Mark Saiz, Maryam Rahmati, Soren David Johnson, Aneesh Satish Bhat, Tony Daniel Baldini, Øystein Øvrebø, Liebert Parreiras Nogueira, Thaqif El Khassawna, Sabine Stötzel, Fernando A Fierro and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07581613 (A Novel Proline-rich Peptide Hydrogel for Periodontal Regeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07581613 phase1 / phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Proline-rich Peptide Hydrogel for Periodontal Regeneration: a Multicenter Parallel-arm Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSiddharth ShanbhagRan2026 to 2030Enrolled40ConditionsPeriodontal Disease, Intrabony Periodontal DefectsArmsHydrogel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Augustine Mark SaizDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. amsaiz@health.ucdavis.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-8667
Maryam RahmatiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Soren David JohnsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Aneesh Satish BhatDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Tony Daniel BaldiniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Øystein ØvrebøDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0318, Norway.
Liebert Parreiras NogueiraDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0318, Norway.
Thaqif El KhassawnaExperimental Trauma Surgery, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Sabine StötzelExperimental Trauma Surgery, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Fernando A FierroInstitute for Regenerative Cures, University of California Davis, 2921 Stockton Blvd. Room 1300, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Mark A LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
J Kent LeachDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Håvard Jostein HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0318, Norway.

Funding

Identifying the superior ossification pathway for tissue engineered approaches to long bone repairR01AR079211 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEACH, J. KENT · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Systemic and local immunomodulation of fracture healing in polytraumaK08AR084594 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Augustine Saiz · 2025 to 2026
$339k
National Institute of Arthritis And Musculoskeletal And Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health K08AR084594NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR084594NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079211NIH HHS R01 AR079211Norges Forskningsråd 331752Orthopaedic Trauma Association 4122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture healing complications, including nonunion, are common in polytrauma patients partly due to systemic inflammatory dysregulation. Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely explored for their regenerative properties, their therapeutic potential in polytrauma patients remains uncertain. Given the clinical interest in both systemic and localized stem cell therapies, understanding how delivery route influences MSCs biodistribution, inflammatory modulation, and therapeutic efficacy is critical for optimizing treatment strategies in polytrauma. Hence, we compared systemic versus local MSCs delivery in a polytrauma model. We evaluated inflammatory responses and bone formation in a C57BL/6J murine model across four groups: (1) isolated fracture, (2) polytrauma (femur fracture + chest trauma), (3) polytrauma + systemic MSC delivery, and (4) polytrauma + local MSC delivery in hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels at the fracture site. Polytrauma induced a prolonged inflammatory response characterized by elevated interleukin 1 alpha and beta (IL-1α & β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and - 5 (MCP-1 & MCP-5). Both delivery methods significantly reduced inflammation and proinflammatory cytokines, though local delivery yielded more consistent effects. IVIS imaging confirmed MSC retention at the fracture site in the local delivery group, while systemic administration of MSCs resulted in pulmonary entrapment. Although systemic MSCs failed to enhance fracture healing significantly, local MSC delivery promoted bone formation evidenced by CT and histological characterizations. These findings demonstrate that local MSC delivery in a hydrogel scaffold represents a superior strategy for improving fracture healing in polytrauma patients compared to systemic delivery.

Indexed as

Bone fractureHydrogelInflammationMesenchymal stem cellPolytrauma

Identifiers

PMID41029699
PMCPMC12487495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.