Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029698›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on family planning and sexual transmitted infection services in Thailand: results from WHO survey.

Jen Sothornwit, Pisake Lumbiganon, Nampet Jampathong, Somporn Rungreangkulkij, Netchanok Kaewjanta, Caron Kim, Moazzam Ali, WHO HRP Social Science Research Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jen SothornwitDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. jensoth@kku.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-7389
Pisake LumbiganonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Mueang Khon Kaen District, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Nampet JampathongCochrane Thailand, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Somporn RungreangkulkijDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Netchanok KaewjantaDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Caron KimDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Moazzam AliDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO HRP Social Science Research Team

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG Germany) COVID-19 Research and Development funding 70918World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has put tremendous burden on health services. Only limited evidence, however, is available to identify the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This world health organization (WHO)-led research sought to evaluate health systems focusing on SRH in Brazil, Burkina Faso, China, Ghana, Italy, Pakistan, Thailand, and the United Kingdom.

methodsThe study was conducted in Thailand on two levels using a mixed-methods design: 1) Individual level included in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with clients (and their partners, where applicable) and healthcare providers (HCPs) to investigate service perceptions and obstacles to SRH service utilization; 2) health facility level, a quantitative evaluation of health facility preparedness for SRH service provision was performed using an adapted version of the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. The data was collected at two timepoints, baseline and endline, at time intervals of 9 months.

resultsAlmost all SRH services were maintained with some shortage of supply such as medications for safe abortion during the first few months. Both providers and clients perceived that all SRH services should be maintained. Some clients were concerned about fear of getting COVID-19 infection while visiting the facility. Some clients switched from short-acting to long-acting contraceptive methods. At the endline, this affect was less obvious since a large proportion of clients were familiar with the pandemic and already received vaccination. The Centre for COVID-19 Situation Administration (CCSA) was established to update COVID-19 pandemic situation, new government policy and intervention to reduce fake news. Telemedicine was used to reduce avoidable appointments. For postpartum women, appointment tended to be more individualized. For those who required pregnancy protection, contraceptive methods were offered to clients before discharge from the hospital. A follow-up visit was performed using both telemedicine and in-person visit at the hospital. For those required medications such as antibiotics for STI, home delivery to clients was provided.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that COVID-19 pandemic had some but non-significant effect on SRH services. The two major referral hospitals in Northeast, Thailand had service readiness to provide SRH services during the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic recovery.

Indexed as

COVID-19Family Planning ServicesReproductive Health ServicesSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2ThailandWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19Public healthReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID41029698
PMCPMC12482536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.