SynthesisBMC health services research2025
Collecting and using social needs data in health settings: a systematic review of the literature on health service utilization and costs.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychosocial Factors Associated with Psychiatric Readmission Following Inpatient Discharge: A Systematic Review.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial determinants of health significantly influence health outcomes and contribute to health inequities across populations. Systematic and routine collection of social needs data and its use to inform interventions within healthcare settings are proposed to reduce health services utilization and healthcare costs. This systematic review examines the impact of social needs data collection and use on health service utilization and healthcare costs.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of studies published between January 2015 and February 2024. We included studies that reported on the collection and use of social needs data within healthcare settings in high-income countries. The review included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, quasi-experimental studies, qualitative studies, quality improvement studies, and mixed methods designs. Databases searched included Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in health service utilization and healthcare costs.
resultsThe review identified 35 relevant studies, predominantly from the United States. Interventions utilizing social needs data were implemented across various healthcare settings, including emergency departments, primary care, and inpatient facilities. Most studies reported reductions in emergency department visits (13/35) and hospitalizations (14/35) associated with collecting and using social needs data. Several studies demonstrated associated cost reductions, particularly in emergency department and hospitalization costs. However, the findings were mixed, with some studies reporting no significant changes or increased costs in certain areas, such as diagnostic testing and ambulatory care.
conclusionsCollecting and using social needs data within healthcare settings shows potential for reducing health service utilization and associated costs, particularly in targeted populations. The variability in outcomes suggests the need for context-specific approaches and further research to standardize reporting and understand the long-term impacts of these interventions. Standardized reporting and more robust study designs are needed to better understand these interventions' long-term impact, best implementation strategies, and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.