ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Factors associated with acupuncture treatment use among middle-aged and older adults with low back pain in China.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcupuncture is used globally as an alternative treatment for patients with low back pain (LBP), effectively reducing pain and improving physical activity. However, the use and profile of acupuncture for LBP in middle-aged and older adults remains understudied. The aim of this study was to identify key factors associated with the use of acupuncture treatment in this population.
methodsUsing the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) dataset, a cross-sectional analysis of 7,929 respondents aged 45 years and older with LBP was conducted. A two-way stepwise regression model was used to identify significant correlates of demographics, health status, and healthcare choice factors with acupuncture use, and multiple theory-driven interaction terms were introduced into the stepwise model and assessed for their enhancement of model fitting and predictive performance by likelihood ratio tests with AUC comparisons. In addition, stratified analyses by gender, age (45-59, 60-74, and ≥ 75 years), and residence were conducted to verify the stability of the model findings.
resultsAmong 7,929 respondents with LBP from the CHARLS 2018 dataset, 1,097 (13.8%) comprised the acupuncture group while 6,832 (86.2%) formed the non-acupuncture group. Significant correlates included females (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.49), pain distress level (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.32-1.78), massage (OR = 8.81, 95% CI: 7.53-10.32), herbal medicine (OR = 2.65, 95% CI. 95% CI: 2.28-3.09), western medications (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.65-2.24).
conclusionLBP patients with certain characteristics tend to use complementary and alternative interventions, including acupuncture. In the future, it is necessary to combine the evaluation of efficacy and mechanism studies to clarify the optimal combination of multimodal treatment and the applicable population, in order to promote the use of acupuncture in the treatment of LBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.