ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Comparison of parallel and orthogonal plating techniques and the predictive role of Hounsfield unit values in AO/OTA type 13-C distal humerus fractures in patients over 50.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of parallel and orthogonal plating in the surgical treatment of AO/OTA type 13-C distal humerus fractures in patients over 50 years of age and to evaluate the predictive role of local bone quality, measured using Hounsfield Unit (HU), on these outcomes.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 80 patients over the age of 50 who underwent surgery for AO/OTA type 13-C distal humerus fractures between 2012 and 2022 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the plating technique: parallel(n = 33) or orthogonal(n = 47). Functional and radiological outcomes were compared, including elbow range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), QuickDASH, time to union, complication and reoperation rates, and presence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Bone quality was stratified based on HU measurements obtained from preoperative CT scans, specifically from the largest intact slice of the capitellum and trochlea in the sagittal view and from the axial slice just above the proximal fracture line, using a threshold value of 124.5 HU corresponding to the median HU value of the patient cohort. MEPS and QuickDASH were evaluated at the 12-month postoperative follow-up.
resultsOrthogonal plating was associated with longer union times (p < 0.001), higher complication rates (p = 0.008), and greater incidence of post-traumatic arthrosis (p = 0.027) compared to parallel plating. Subgroup analysis revealed that in patients with HU ≤ 124.5, orthogonal plating was linked to significantly increased nonunion risk (p = 0.03) and longer union times (p < 0.001), whereas parallel plating yielded more consistent results regardless of bone quality. Nonunion was significantly higher in the HU ≤ 124.5 subgroup (p = 0.031), and particularly more frequent in orthogonal plating within this group (p = 0.04).
conclusionWhile both plating techniques provided comparable functional outcomes, orthogonal plating was associated with higher complication and nonunion rates, especially in patients with poor bone quality. This may be attributed to the reduced mechanical stability of orthogonal constructs in osteoporotic bone, which may compromise fixation strength and lead to higher failure rates. HU assessment from routine CT scans may aid in preoperative decision-making to optimize surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.