ArticleBMC public health2025
The executive function-related learning and practicing activity analysis tool (EFRLPAAT): development of an observation system for assessing the effectiveness of physical education practice.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe teaching experimental process of exercise intervention for executive functions in children and adolescents lacks the necessary systematic observation tools, which cannot ensure the effectiveness of the intervention process. Therefore, the Executive Function-Related Learning and Practicing Activity Analysis Tool (EFPLRAAT) have been developed.
methodsInvitations were sent to 27 experts (15 in the first round and 12 in the second round) from the fields of school physical education, psychology, and motor skill studies to evaluate and screen the preliminary established indicators. Kendall's concordance coefficient, selection rate, and mean were used to reflect the content validity of the tool. The discriminant validity of the observation tool was established through systematic observation of 42 open and closed skill physical education classes. The concordance coefficient was used to reflect the reliability among observers.
resultsThe EFRLPAAT consists of four primary and nine secondary indicators, mainly including movement status, movement scenarios, action structures, and interpersonal interactions. The expert advice has a medium degree of similarity (Kendall' W = 0.491, χ
conclusionThe EFRLPAAT can be used as an observation tool to ensure the validity of the experimental process, helping the researcher to clarify the validity of their experiment, and it can also provide an effective observation tool for physical education teaching, pushing teachers to continuously feedback and optimize their teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.