ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Acquired bipolar cell disorder presenting with photophobia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients have been recently reported who had a common symptom of unilateral photophobia. The electroretinograms (ERGs) recorded from the eyes of these patients had a negative shape with the a-wave normal to slightly attenuated, and the rod and cone responses severely reduced, i.e., a-wave > b-wave. The patients did not complain of night blindness, and the visual acuity and color vision were relatively well preserved. These patients were diagnosed with acute diffuse occult inner retinopathy (ADOIR). We report our findings in such a case in which the unilateral findings progressed to the fellow eye. In the end, we diagnosed our case with bilateral ADOIR. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 75-year-old woman whose main complaint was photophobia. She had undergone cataract surgery on both eyes by a neighborhood ophthalmologist. However, her symptoms did not improve, and she was referred to the Saitama Medical University Hospital in May 202X. At our initial examination, she did not complain of night blindness, and her decimal visual acuity in the right eye was 1.0 and that of her left eye was 0.9. The fundus photographs and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images and Goldmann perimetric visual fields were within normal limits. The full-field mixed electroretinograms (ERGs) had a negative shape with severely reduced rod, cone, and flicker responses in the right eye. Multifocal ERGs showed reduced responses only in the macula of both eyes.
conclusionsWe conclude that our patient had bilateral ADOIR. The ERGs were the key for reaching this diagnosis and would be important for determining the mechanism of photophobia that occurs at the retinal level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.