Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029557›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Testing regular expression searches and machine learning models to determine housing instability and low income status from primary care electronic medical record data in Toronto, Ontario.

Stephanie Garies, Christopher Meaney, Karen Weyman, Gary Bloch, Jessica Gronsbell, Nassim Vahidi-Williams, Ri Wang, Noah Crampton, Karen Tu, Andrew D Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephanie GariesDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. sgaries@ucalgary.ca.
Christopher MeaneyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen WeymanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gary BlochDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jessica GronsbellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nassim Vahidi-WilliamsDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ri WangMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Noah CramptonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen TuDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew D PintoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousing and income are important social determinants of health (SDoH). Primary care providers often do not have information about these determinants, which could be used to support equitable health system planning and care delivery. The aim of this study was to use primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data to test two approaches (machine learning and regular expression searches) to obtain information about patients' housing instability and low income status.

methodsWe used de-identified EMR data from the St. Michael's Hospital Academic Family Health Team (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). A Health Equity Questionnaire is also routinely distributed to patients and includes questions about income and housing status; this formed the reference standard. First, a regular expression (REGEX) classifier was created using key text terms and codes; the second approach used supervised machine learning models (XGBoost). Discrimination and calibration metrics were calculated as compared to the patient-reported responses.

results11,794 eligible patients were included in the housing cohort and 10,454 were in the income cohort. Overall, both approaches had poor sensitivity for determining both housing instability (XGBoost: 3.1%, REGEX: 29.0%) and low income status (XGBoost: 41.7%, REGEX: 17.6%). Positive predictive value (PPV) was satisfactory for the machine learning approach (83.3% for housing, 72.9% for income).

conclusionWhile the machine learning approach demonstrated reasonable PPV, the overall metrics were poor and unlikely to be useful in a clinical setting for identifying patients with housing or economic needs. More robust analysis could be explored, but continued patient-captured SDoH information is necessary.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHousingMachine LearningPovertyPrimary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedOntarioSocial Determinants of HealthArtificial intelligenceElectronic medical recordsPrimary carePublic healthSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID41029557
PMCPMC12487253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.