Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029536›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Post-corneal tattooing trigeminal nerve-distributed hyperpigmentation: a case report.

Naif Alsuliman, Shahad Alruwaili

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naif AlsulimanOculoplastic Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad AlruwailiFellowship and Residency Deparment, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. shahadabdullahalr@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundkeratopigmentation is a proven cosmetic and surgical intervention for corneal irregularities or opaqueness, notably in blind eye. postoperative skin hyperpigmentation localized to a trigeminal nerve distribution has not been documented in any previous research. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a rare case of trigeminal nerve-distributed hyperpigmentation following corneal tattooing in a patient with a history of multiple procedures. Over the years, he underwent multiple ocular and periocular reconstructive surgeries. The patient initially underwent corneal tattooing in December 2014 for cosmetic rehabilitation, which yielded satisfactory results with no complaints. However, following an augmentation of the corneal tattoo in 2023, he developed hyperpigmentation of the skin localized to the ophthalmic (V1) division of the trigeminal nerve.

conclusionThis case showcases an uncommon but noteworthy dermatologic reaction following ocular tattooing, raising questions about potential pigment migration, neural-mediated skin responses, or localized inflammatory sequelae.

Indexed as

CorneaHyperpigmentationTattooingTrigeminal NerveHumansMaleMiddle AgedCorneal tattoDermatological reactionHyperpigmentationKeratopigmentation

Identifiers

PMID41029536
PMCPMC12486738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.