ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Cross-sectional evaluation of overlooked risk enhancer for hypertension among primary care patients: social isolation.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssociations between social network usage and hypertension are poorly understood among primary care patients. The present study aimed to investigate the association between social isolation and hypertension among the middle-aged and older population in primary care.
methodsThis cross-sectional research was conducted on a face-to-face basis with 411 patients applying to primary healthcare centers in Ankara, Turkey. After collecting sociodemographic characteristics and relevant medical history, social isolation was assessed using the Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6), with a total score of ≤ 12 indicating social isolation. Physical activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Form). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with hypertension.
resultsOf the participants, 41.4% were hypertensive and 33.6% were socially isolated. Of those diagnosed with hypertension, 50.6% had uncontrolled blood pressure. Hypertension was significantly more common in socially isolated individuals (54.70% vs. 18.70%; p < 0.001). Participants with a strong social network had significantly higher rates of blood pressure goal attainment (53.60% vs. 37.20%; p < 0.032). Analysis using multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that older participants [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 1.13, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.09,1.17, p < 0.001], diagnosed with diabetes (AOR = 2.57, 95%CI = 1.46,4.53, p = 0.001), and lower levels of social engagement (AOR = 3.78, 95%CI = 2.13, 6.71, p < 0.001) were more likely to be hypertensive.
conclusionNot having strong social relationships appears to be associated with hypertension in primary care as well as diabetes and increased age. Future interventions to improve hypertension prevention and control should be tailored to address individual social deprivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.