ArticleMovement ecology2025
Experience-based optimal foraging on planktonic prey in Baikal seals.
Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding how predatory animals efficiently locate prey with limited knowledge of its location is challenging. Optimal foraging theory suggests that animals improve their food intake through experience-based adjustments of search patterns. For example, animals feeding on clustered prey may repeatedly search successful areas and move farther away when unsuccessful (the 'win-stay, lose-shift' strategy). A related concept, area-restricted search, predicts that animals initially search broadly and then switch to a more localized, tortuous search upon finding clustered prey. However, few studies have empirically supported these predictions for large aquatic predators due to difficulties in recording their foraging success on known prey species.
methodsWe used biologging techniques to record the fine-scale foraging behaviour of Baikal seals in Lake Baikal, which hunt tiny, clustered, planktonic amphipods at high rates. We reconstructed their three-dimensional movement paths during dives and estimated the timing of prey capture events based on video-validated body acceleration data.
resultsSeals moved shorter horizontal distances and exhibited greater directional changes after more successful dives, supporting the 'win-stay, lose-shift' strategy. Consistent with area-restricted search, successful foraging dives led to decreased speed and increased tortuosity in the horizontal plane.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that experience-based behavioural adjustments at a dive-to-dive scale are crucial for Baikal seals-and possibly other large aquatic predators-to maintain high foraging rates. Furthermore, they illustrate how an exceptionally high predator-prey body mass ratio (> 500,000) for a single-prey-feeding (non-filter-feeding) predator is maintained in the unique Lake Baikal ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.