ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
"A rare atypical aortic valve papillary fibroelastoma in a young patient: a case report on diagnosis and surgical challenges".
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPapillary fibroelastoma (PFE) is a rare, benign cardiac tumor that most commonly involves the heart valves, particularly the aortic valve. Although often asymptomatic, PFEs can lead to serious complications such as embolic or ischemic events. This case highlights an atypical presentation of PFE in a young patient, emphasizing the diagnostic and management challenges encountered. CASE PRESENTATION: A 24-year-old male presented with angina-like chest pain. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed a mobile, pedunculated mass attached to the aortic side of the right non-coronary commissure of the aortic valve. Further imaging confirmed the mass contributed to coronary blood flow obstruction, with no evidence of coronary artery disease. Preoperative evaluation revealed a protamine sulfate allergy, requiring adjustments to anticoagulation management. Given the risk of embolization and coronary obstruction, surgical resection was performed successfully without complications. The postoperative course was uneventful, and repeat imaging demonstrated no recurrence or residual regurgitation.
conclusionThis case emphasizes the importance of recognizing PFE as a potentially serious condition, even in young patients. It highlights the necessity of individualized management strategies for uncommon presentations and provides additional insight into the perioperative considerations associated with allergies to critical surgical medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.