Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029412›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Cerebral amyloid-β, glucose metabolism and hippocampal volume in major depression with and without suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology (SNAP).

Min-Jung Wu, Ing-Tsung Hsiao, Kun-Ju Lin, Yi-Ming Wu, Kuan-Yi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min-Jung WuDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, Guishan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Ing-Tsung HsiaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging and Translation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Kun-Ju LinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging and Translation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Yi-Ming WuDepartment of Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kuan-Yi WuDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, Guishan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. kuanyiwu1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) can encompass suspected non-Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology (SNAP), characterized by negative cerebral Amyloid-β (Aβ) and positive neurodegeneration (ND) biomarkers. Relationships among cerebral Aβ deposition, glucose metabolism, and hippocampal volume in SNAP and non-SNAP MDD groups remain unclear.

methodsWe conducted cross-sectional analyses of 136 MDD patients (enrolment age ≥ 50 years), classified into SNAP (n = 71) and non-SNAP (n = 65) groups. Dual-phase

resultsIn the non-SNAP MDD, greater Aβ deposition was associated with reduced glucose metabolism and smaller HVa, while HVa positively correlated with metabolism. Glucose metabolism partially mediated the relationship between Aβ deposition and both hippocampal atrophy and cognition function. In the SNAP MDD group, lower Aβ deposition was associated with lower glucose metabolism. While more lifetime depressive episodes were related to smaller HVa, depression severity showed a positive correlation with HVa. Additional subgroup analyses stratified by age and Aβ/ND status were also conducted.

conclusionsThese findings suggest distinct biological patterns in SNAP and non-SNAP MDD. Age- and biomarker (Aβ/ND)-stratified analyses yielded consistent Aβ-metabolism-atrophy profiles; however, the biomarker-stratified results should be interpreted with caution due to limited sample sizes. Notably, the non-SNAP group comprises biologically heterogeneous subgroups, which may obscure important distinctions and limit the interpretability of pooled findings. These results underscore the need for subgroup-specific approaches to better elucidate the pathophysiology of MDD.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesGlucoseHippocampusMajor Depressive DisorderAgedAlzheimer DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyAmyloid beta-PeptidesGlucose18F-florbetapir (AV45/Amyvid)Amyloid-β (Aβ)Glucose metabolismHippocampal atrophyMajor depressive disorder (MDD)Suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology (SNAP)

Identifiers

PMID41029412
PMCPMC12482320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.