ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Involvement of patient organisations in research activities: actions taken and lessons learned in a clinical research study for osteogenesis imperfecta.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases are chronic, progressive, and debilitating conditions, affecting 3.5-5.9% of the global population. Clinical research studies are crucial for developing new diagnostic approaches and treatments and for overcoming the lack of awareness and the need of expertise surrounding these diseases. Involving patient organizations in clinical studies is widely considered a promising approach, to overcome barriers and to facilitate research activities. The aim of this paper is to present the actions taken, the relevant results, and the lessons learned from involving a patient organization in shaping, conducting, and disseminating a clinical study on rare patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.
resultsIn a context of a clinical study in which patients underwent a comprehensive, fully instrumental gait analysis and an evaluation of specific movement tasks using stereophotogrammetry and wearable sensors, we assessed all the actions taken and the results achieved by the implementation of an original collaborative model between a public institution and a national patient organization. To generalize our collaborative experience, steps and stages of the research process that can benefit the most from the support of a patient organization were identified, experimental protocol drafting, ethic committee approval, patient enrolment, and dissemination. Patients reported positive feedback in a short questionnaire on the use case experience. Moreover, we highlighted the gains and the weaknesses of this approach.
conclusionsThis experience resulted in several benefits for all the actors involved, strengthening the collaboration between the PO and researchers and fostering a cohesive and cooperative network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.