ArticleBMC health services research2025
The NOSO-COVID study: a large-scale survey assessing stakeholder perspectives on patient and family engagement in infection prevention, informed by Q-methodology findings.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections are common in hospitalized patients, exacerbated by COVID-19. Engaging patients and families in infection prevention and control may enhance adherence, but optimal strategies remain unclear.
objectiveThis study developed a large-scale survey, informed by previous Q-methodology research, to assess stakeholder perspectives on patient and family engagement in infection prevention, identify consensus and disagreement, and explore socio-demographic and work-related influences.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in surgical and family medicine units at two Canadian university hospitals in 2023. The NOSO-COVID survey included 17 Likert-scale items derived from identified infection prevention engagement viewpoints. Data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression.
resultsAmong 212 participants (patients, family members, and staff), responses varied on infection prevention engagement strategies. Common suggestions included bedside disinfectants and monitoring staff compliance. Older participants, particularly in family medicine units, were more supportive of educational and behavioral measures. Comfort with advocating for infection prevention differed across units, with surgical unit participants expressing less confidence. Institutional culture influenced perceptions, with staff at one hospital reporting greater ease in engaging patients and families in infection prevention. Four consensus items were identified, emphasizing staff reminders for hand hygiene, availability of disinfectants, and providing accessible infection prevention information.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that tailoring IPC engagement strategies to hospital unit cultures and stakeholder needs is essential. Strategies to enhance communication, address power dynamics, and promote shared responsibilities to improve IPC should be identified and their effectiveness evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.