Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029362›Full record

ArticleOne health outlook2025

Examining bhutan's zoonotic disease policies through a One Health lens: a qualitative policy analysis using the policy triangle framework.

Bir Doj Rai, Tenzin Tenzin, Dorji Tshering, Narapati Dahal, Gizachew A Tessema, Lin Fritschi, Sylvester Dodzi Nyadanu, Gavin Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health outlook, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bir Doj RaiDepartment of Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Thimphu, Bhutan. birdoj_rai@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-466X
Tenzin TenzinSub-Regional Representation for Southern Africa, World Organisation for Animal Health, Gaborone, Botswana.
Dorji TsheringPhuentsholing General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Chhukha, Bhutan.
Narapati DahalDepartment of Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Gizachew A TessemaCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western, Australia.
Lin FritschiCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western, Australia.
Sylvester Dodzi NyadanuCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western, Australia.
Gavin PereiraCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recurrent threat of zoonotic diseases necessitates integrated, multisectoral strategies, such as the One Health, which recognises the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health. Institutionalising such approaches requires comprehensive national policy frameworks that ensure cross-sectoral coordination, sustainable resource allocation, and robust governance mechanisms. Bhutan adopted One Health in 2013, however, its integration into national policies remains unexplored. This study aimed to examine Bhutan's policy landscape for zoonotic disease prevention and control through a One Health lens.

methodsEleven documents related to zoonotic disease prevention and control in Bhutan, published between 2013 and 2024, were retrieved from official government websites and obtained from relevant authorities. A qualitative document analysis was conducted, guided by the Policy Triangle Framework, which evaluates policy across four dimensions: Actors, Context, Content, and Process. Key One Health components were mapped to each dimension using internationally recognised One Health frameworks to systematically evaluate the extent to which Bhutan's zoonotic disease policies align with the principles of One Health approach.

resultsThe findings revealed clearly defined roles and responsibilities among key stakeholders, but limited inclusion of the environmental sector. While the policies reflected contextual relevance and alignment to international disease prevention and control frameworks, their integration with holistic One Health strategies remained limited due to persistent sectoral silos. Policy contents revealed a strong commitment to disease prevention and control, but major gaps were identified in financial planning, human resource development, and investment in technical infrastructure. Policy processes were largely undocumented, with weak stakeholder engagement, limited cross-sectoral coordination, and absence of robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.

conclusionsStrengthening policy design, enhancing governance structures and institutional frameworks are essential to improve intersectoral coordination, resource allocation, and stakeholder engagement for effective operationalisation of zoonotic disease prevention and control within the One Health framework in Bhutan. The insights from this study may offer practical implications for low- and middle-income countries working to embed One Health into national policy. Furthermore, it demonstrates how the Policy Triangle Framework can be adapted to systematically evaluate policy alignment in the context of One Health.

Indexed as

BhutanOne HealthPolicy analysisPolicy triangle frameworkSouth AsiaZoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID41029362
PMCPMC12487269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.