ArticleBMC health services research2025
Use of implementation science frameworks to identify core components and sustainability characteristics of a quality improvement learning collaborative.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Evidence-Based Practice Through Social Movement Strategies: A Case Study in Healthcare Transformation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementation Science (IS) frameworks facilitate definition of core and optional components of innovations, interventions and programmes, which increases the likelihood of successful implementation and sustainment. We used IS frameworks to characterise a hospital-based interdisciplinary quality improvement learning collaborative (QILC) which was established to develop quality improvement (QI) capability among front-line staff. The aim was to identify factors that supported implementation, potential threats to sustainability and elements that may influence dissemination into other settings.
methodsOf five IS frameworks evaluated, two were selected, the Active Implementation Framework (action-oriented, dependent on feedback loops and improvement cycles) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (enabled definition of core components). The QILC was mapped against the drivers and constructs of each.
resultsFactors relating to the QILC's leadership; the generation of tension for change; and the use of both internal and external networks were central features in implementation. Key drivers included the characteristics of front-line ownership, iterative development and tribality of the QILC, each being central to QI methodology. Risks to sustainability included patchy implementation, a requirement for greater alignment with organisational priorities, requirement for coaching and recruitment of additional leaders to support succession planning.
conclusionsIS provided frameworks for retrospective analysis of a QI learning collaborative and identified factors that threaten sustainability. This analysis should help guide formative evaluations of similar QI learning collaboratives and offer an organisational framework to facilitate successful replication within different parts of an organisation and across multiple settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.