Trial reportOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Exit interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients with classic galactosemia to explore meaningfulness of changes in the ACTION-galactosemia kids trial.
Trial report in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClassic Galactosemia is a rare, autosomal recessive disease in which galactose is not metabolized properly due to severe deficiency/absence of the galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GALT) enzyme, converting to an aberrant and toxic metabolite, galactitol. Living with the debilitating symptoms and long-term consequences of Classic Galactosemia creates a heavy burden on patients' and their families' lives. Objectives were to: (1) Evaluate the impact and burden of disease; (2) Qualitatively explore changes in patient symptoms following treatment; and (3) Document the meaningfulness of changes resulting from treatment with govorestat as assessed by the Caregiver Global Impression of Severity (CGIS) and Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scales. METHODOLOGY: The AT-007-1002 clinical trial involved a Phase 1/2 dose escalation component (Part A) followed by a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled long-term administration component (Part B) that evaluated potential clinical benefit. Exit Interviews were completed prior to unblinding of data. The in-depth, qualitative interviews were semi-structured, using a discussion guide, and conducted by either Zoom or GoToMeeting. Thirty-six caregiver interviews were conducted, capturing the experience of 37 pediatric patients (one caregiver had 2 patients enrolled in the study). Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes or patterns within the data. All analyses were conducted on blinded data. Following finalization of the analysis and report findings, post-hoc analysis of the unblinded data was then conducted to explore the meaningfulness of patients experience by treatment arm.
resultsThis study confirms the substantial burden known to be associated with Classic Galactosemia in a pediatric population. The difficulties experienced were across multiple areas including cognitive function, behavior/social function, motor function, emotional function, communication, vision problems, ovarian insufficiency, sensory difficulties, and sleep problems. The interviews demonstrated that most patients (approximately two thirds) experienced an improvement in symptoms and impacts associated with classic galactosemia over the course of the trial. Nearly all caregivers reported that they perceived a 1-category change on the Caregiver Global Impression of Severity or Caregiver Global Impression of Change items, indicating severity and change respectively, was meaningful to them and the patient. Unblinded analysis of the exit interview data confirmed the patient experience reported by caregivers was different between the treatment arms, providing qualitative support for the treatment benefit of govorestat when compared to placebo. Furthermore, the qualitative data from caregivers provide in-depth insights of their unique lived experience that highlight the substantial impact that this improvement had on the caregiver's and the patient's quality of life. The improvements observed led to a reduction on the burden of Classic Galactosemia and may lead to a greater patient's greater independence.
conclusionsThe exit interviews confirmed the burden of Classic Galactosemia disease across multiple domains. Qualitative investigation suggests that observed changes are meaningful to the patient and caregiver, and changes were more commonly reported in those receiving govorestat compared to placebo. Full clinical trial findings will be published separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.