Observational studyBMC health services research2025
Characteristics of family medicine physician associates/assistants in the United States.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe family medicine (FM) workforce in the United States (U.S.) includes physicians, physician associates/assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs). These family medicine practitioners are patients' first point of contact, providing preventative, continuous healthcare, care coordination, and patient-centered care. Yet, despite their importance in the healthcare system, the shortage of FM practitioners persists. Considering the general medical education of PAs and limited research on their roles in FM, this research aims to understand the employment characteristics of this professional group.
methodsThis cross-sectional observational research utilized a 2023 national dataset from the National Commission on Certification of PAs (NCCPA). We used standard descriptive and bivariate analyses to summarize the demographic and professional attributes of PAs in FM (n = 20,940) versus those in all other specialties (n = 106,001).
resultsIn 2023, 16.5% of PAs indicated working in FM. PAs in FM had a median age of 41, and 68.8% self-identified as female. PAs in FM versus those in other medical specialties (all p < 0.001) were more likely to self-identify as Black/African American (3.8% versus 3.4%) and Hispanic/Latino(a/x) (9.3% versus 6.6%). A higher ratio of PAs in FM indicated practicing in rural/isolated settings (15.3% versus 5.7%) and reported using another language other than English to communicate with patients (26.4% versus 21.7%; all p < 0.001) than their colleagues in other medical specialties. FM PAs were more likely to indicate working in office-based private settings, community health centers, rural health clinics, and public/community health clinics than PAs in all other specialties. Compared to their colleagues in other specialties, a higher percentage of PAs in FM indicated providing telemedicine services (66.1% versus 38.1%; p < 0.001). Family medicine PAs versus those in other medical disciplines reported earning $10,000 less (annual income). A slightly lower proportion of PAs in FM reported being satisfied with their current employment and were more likely to experience symptoms of burnout compared to PAs in other medical specialties.
conclusionsThis study reinforces the critical role of PAs in FM in mitigating the healthcare access crisis, particularly in underresourced and rural areas. A better understanding of factors associated with PAs pursuing and sustaining practice in FM could alleviate some of the burden of the projected healthcare provider shortage in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.