ArticleBMC public health2025
Can supplementary private health insurance reduce poverty vulnerability? Evidence from Shandong Province.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Willingness to pay for supplementary medical insurance and its influencing factors among rural residents in ethnic minority areas.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite achieving near-universal social health insurance coverage, some Chinese continue to grapple with issues of poverty vulnerability. Supplementary private health insurance (SPHI) serves as a crucial complement to the social health insurance system. This study aimed to investigate its efficacy in mitigating poverty vulnerability.
methodsCross-sectional data of 18,426 representative samples were obtained from the Sixth National Health Service Survey (Shandong) conducted in 2018. A three-stage feasible generalised least squares estimation procedure was employed to estimate poverty vulnerability. Additionally, we explored the impact of SPHI on poverty vulnerability using the propensity score matching (PSM) method to balance treatment and control groups along observable dimensions. To address the potential endogeneity issues, we used the instrumental variable (IV) estimation approach to determine how SPHI affects poverty vulnerability.
resultsWe found that SPHI reduced the probability of poverty vulnerability for individuals enrolled in social health insurance. Furthermore, SPHI had a more pronounced protective effect on respondents with chronic diseases, those aged over 60 years, and those living in urban areas or western Shandong.
conclusionsThe results imply that supplementary SPHI can be effective in poverty reduction even among populations with basic health insurance. Therefore, we encourage governments in other low- and middle-income countries to consider implementing supplementary SPHI for vulnerable people to reduce medical impoverishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.