ArticleBMC public health2025
Home Fire Safety Visits by the Fire and Rescue Service: a qualitative study of the perspectives of firefighters, advocates and service leaders.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe UK Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) routinely deliver Home Fire Safety Visits (HFSVs) in people's homes. HFSVs offer support with fire safety and a range of health-related issues. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of those delivering and designing the HFSV service.
methodsTwenty eight members of the FRS who deliver HFSVs and service leaders involved in HFSV service-design were interviewed. Data were analysed thematically.
resultsParticipants described a cultural shift within the FRS from response to prevention and public health work. Most felt positively about this change, though some reported difficulty adjusting to their new role. Working with other services was seen as integral to the HFSV service due to the links between fire risk and other facets of health. However, participants felt the FRS were expected to plug gaps in other services, despite not always feeling equipped to do so. Challenges were identified in reaching and supporting underserved groups (e.g. mental health issues and dementia).
conclusionsHFSVs could address a range of health-related needs. However, whether the FRS should be expected to fill gaps in other services needs further exploration. Supporting underserved groups via HFSVs is important and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.