Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029268›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Mapping support systems: a cross-sectional examination of personal support networks, perceived support, mental health outcomes, and help-seeking behaviours among UK undergraduate students.

Emily Vicary, Dharmi Kapadia, Penny Bee, Helen Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily VicaryDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. emily.vicary@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-3880
Dharmi KapadiaDepartment of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-0400
Helen BrooksDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-0200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUndergraduate students in the UK experience elevated rates of mental health difficulties but often face barriers to accessing formal support. Personal support networks - the friends, family, and other social ties students rely on - may play a critical role in promoting good mental health and guiding effective help-seeking. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between support network structure, perceived support availability, and mental health outcomes and help-seeking intentions among UK undergraduate students.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was completed by 287 undergraduates from 68 UK universities. Participants reported the size of their support network, relationship durations, relationship diversity, and support diversity using a modified Perceived Support Network Inventory. Perceived support was assessed using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Depression and anxiety were measured with the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, and help-seeking intentions with an adapted General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. Associations were examined using Spearman's rank-order correlational analyses and four multiple linear regression models.

resultsLarger, longer-standing, and more diverse networks were positively associated with higher levels of perceived support. Perceived support predicted less severe depression and anxiety symptoms, independent of network structure. Students with higher perceived support were more likely to seek informal help and less likely to seek formal help. Network structural features generally did not predict help-seeking, although greater support diversity was associated with lower intention to seek informal help.

conclusionsPerceived availability of support, rather than structural characteristics of support networks, was the primary factor linked to improved mental health and help-seeking preferences. Strengthening students' perceived support may be critical for promoting resilience and encouraging appropriate help-seeking behaviour.

Indexed as

Help-Seeking BehaviorMental HealthPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial SupportStudentsAdolescentAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomUniversitiesHelp-seeking behaviourHigher educationMental health outcomesNetwork sizePerceived support availabilityPersonal support networksSocial supportUndergraduate mental healthUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID41029268
PMCPMC12487519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.