ArticleBMC public health2025
Health facility capacity and technical efficiency in the provision of adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Niger.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Performance Measurement and Management in Child and Adolescent Healthcare Services.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Availability of adolescent mental, sexual and reproductive health services (ASRH) and technical efficiency of ASRH service delivery in Niger.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Burden and Risk Factor Patterns of Reproductive System Tumors and Non-Tumor Diseases Among Asian Women, 1990-2021: Evidence from the GBD Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfficiency in the use of financial and other resources for providing adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) policies and programs is an important factor that can affect provision of and access to services in resource-constrained contexts of developing countries with limited capacity. However, very few studies have been conducted to understand this situation. Our study, therefore, estimated technical efficiency scores for health facilities that offer primary ASRH care services in Niger and the relationship between the capacity of these health facilities and their level of technical efficiency.
methodsThe data used for this study were collected from a survey of 71 primary healthcare facilities providing ASRH in Niger from January 28 to March 15, 2022. A stochastic frontier analysis technique based on the Cobb-Douglas production function specification was used for analysis. A Tobit model estimation was used to examine the relationship between health facility capacity and the level of technical efficiency.
resultsThe average technical efficiency in production of primary care ASRH services of the health facilities in the sample was 58% implying high levels of technical inefficiency. Disaggregated analysis revealed that the average score was greater in health facilities where the primary caretaker or head of the institution was female (60%) rather than male (53%). Primary healthcare facility capacity was assessed in four dimensions of operational capacity, managerial capacity, adaptive capacity and leadership capacity. There was a positive association between health facility capacity and the technical efficiency score. However, the levels of association differed from one dimension of health facility capacity to another.
conclusionsThere is much room for improving the efficient use of financial and other resources in primary healthcare facilities that provide ASRH in Niger. Potential interventions include giving women more responsibility for these facilities and strengthening the ASRH production capacity of these facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.