Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029254›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Wealth differentials and contraceptive choices among women in India: insights from NFHS-5 (2019-21).

Roni Sikdar, Dhananjay W Bansod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roni SikdarDepartment of Public Health & Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, 400088, Maharashtra, India. ronisikdar16@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6747-1275
Dhananjay W BansodDepartment of Public Health & Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, 400088, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-4656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWealth status plays a crucial role in shaping contraceptive choices among women in India. This study aims to investigate the impact of wealth quintiles on current contraceptive use and identify the factors contributing to differentials in contraceptive choices. METHODOLOGY: Using data from National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021), current contraceptive use was categorised into non-users, traditional method users, permanent method users, and reversible modern method users. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate the association between wealth status and contraceptive method use while controlling for potential socio-economic factors. In addition, Wagstaff's concentration index was used to assess wealth inequality in each contraceptive method.

resultsThe results indicate that 37.8% of women from the poorest quintiles do not use contraceptives, compared to 30.6% in the richest quintile. The use of reversible modern methods increases from 15.9% among the poorest to 25.0% among the richest. Women in the richest wealth quintiles were significantly more likely to use reversible modern methods (RRR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.55-1.68) than in the poorest quintiles. Permanent method uses peaks in the middle wealth quintile (42.6%) and decreases in the richest quintile (33.7%). Regional disparities also exist, with higher use of permanent methods in southern and western India, while reversible methods were more common in northeastern and northern regions. The concentration index revealed a pro-rich pattern for reversible methods (CI = 0.092), while traditional and non-use were concentrated among poorer women. DISCUSSIONS: The findings suggested that wealth status significantly influenced contraceptive method use among currently married women in India. Reversible modern methods were more commonly used by wealthier women, whereas poorer women were more likely to rely on permanent methods or remain non-users. These differentials indicated persistent inequities in access to a diverse contraceptive method mix. These findings highlighted the need for targeted policy measures to improve availability of reversible methods in underserved areas, strengthening provider training to support informed choice, and addressing demand-side barriers through community support were essential to advanced reproductive health equity and help to meet the SDG 3.7 target in India.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorContraceptionContraception BehaviorAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultContraceptive choiceIndiaNational family health surveyWealth disparityWealth quintile

Identifiers

PMID41029254
PMCPMC12487088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.