Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41029219›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025

Breaking myths and building awareness: spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in Palestine-what women know and what holds them backs- a cross- sectional study.

Saleh Juneidi, Islam Jadallah, Mohammed Saleh, Bayyena Abu-Radwan, Haya Abu Mayyaleh, Ahmad Fasfoos, Dirar Zatari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saleh JuneidiFaculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine.
Islam JadallahFaculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine. islamjad30@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4785-4275
Mohammed SalehFaculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3114-8120
Bayyena Abu-RadwanFaculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2862-3644
Haya Abu MayyalehFaculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3733-5986
Ahmad FasfoosFaculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9786-8529
Dirar ZatariDepartment of anesthesiology, Al-Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8650-2074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCesarean section (CS) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become the preferred anesthesia technique for CS due to its advantages over general anesthesia, including better maternal hemodynamic stability and improved neonatal outcomes. However, maternal knowledge and attitudes toward SA significantly influence decision making and perioperative experiences. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of Palestinian women toward SA during CS.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Palestinian women aged 18-60 years who met the inclusion criteria and voluntarily provided informed consent. Data were collected using a structured, validated questionnaire distributed through social media platforms and maternity wards in Palestinian hospitals. A sample size of 384 participants was calculated using OpenEpi, with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.

resultsA total of 415 Palestinian females were included. The mean age was 27.3 ± 6.8 years. More than half expressed a preference for spinal anesthesia (SA) over general anesthesia (GA) for cesarean delivery. Knowledge levels were generally low, with less than 10% demonstrating high awareness. Although 63% had heard of regional anesthesia, fewer were familiar with SA specifically. Misconceptions were frequent; the majority failed to identify the correct injection site, and over half were unaware that SA could be used during active labor. While most participants recognized that SA allows maternal consciousness during surgery, less than one-third correctly identified its reduced fetal exposure compared to GA. Among those expressing concerns, the most commonly reported barriers were fear of chronic back pain, headaches, permanent paralysis, painful injection, intraoperative awareness, nausea or vomiting, and hypotension.

conclusionAlthough a significant proportion of Palestinian women were willing to receive spinal anesthesia, many exhibited concerns and misconceptions about its safety and effects. These findings highlight the need for improved patient education and counseling on SA to enhance maternal confidence and decision-making. Addressing these concerns through targeted awareness programs could lead to better patient experiences and outcomes in cesarean deliveries.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalArabsCesarean SectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAnesthesia, GeneralCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMiddle EastPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnesthesia choiceCesarean sectionMaternal awarenessObstetric anesthesiaPain managementPatient knowledgeSpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID41029219
PMCPMC12482626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.