ArticleMedicine2025
Thyroid dysfunction and osteoporosis: A two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous observational studies have suggested a potential link between hyperthyroidism and osteoporosis (OP) risk. However, the relationship between hypothyroidism and osteoporosis risk remains uncertain due to the inherent limitations of observational studies, such as reverse causality and confounders, which complicate the determination of causality. To address these issues, we conducted a 2-way, 2-sample Mendelian randomized study using instrumental variables selected from a large genome-wide association study meta-analysis dataset of European origin. This approach allowed us to assess the causal effects of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism on OP. Additionally, inverse Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to estimate the causal effect of OP on hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. The primary analytical method used was inverse variance weighting, supplemented by MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analyses, and assessments for horizontal pleiotropy complemented the primary analysis. The MR analysis revealed a causal relationship between hyperthyroidism (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.36; P = 3.61E-07) and hypothyroidism (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03; P = .013) and the risk of OP. Conversely, no causal relationship was found between OP and hyperthyroidism (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.09; P = .208) or hypothyroidism (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.92-1.33; P = .297) in reverse MR analysis. Therefore, our study confirms a causal link between hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism with OP, suggesting that individuals with these conditions may have an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms and provide robust evidence for clinical guidelines aimed at preventing OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.