ArticleMedicine2025
Digitally planned bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with 3D-printed splints for skeletal class III malocclusion: A case series.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of structured training in osteotomy and splitting for BSSO using a 3D-printed mandibular model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring the Interface Between International Nongovernmental Organizations and Local Vietnamese Hospitals in Cleft Care.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Quality assurance in orthognathic surgery using Brons-Mulié's soft tissue analysis, Nakamura's asymmetry index and a simple Enface analysis.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleThis retrospective, single-center, non-consecutive case series explores the outcomes of digitally planned bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using three-dimensional (3D) printed surgical splints in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion. PATIENT CONCERNS: Three adult male patients who underwent combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment at a private orthodontic center between January 2022 and June 2024 were included nonconsecutively. Presurgical orthodontic preparation was undertaken to decompensate the incisors, align the dental arches, and create optimal conditions for precise skeletal corrections. DIAGNOSES: The diagnoses were class III malocclusions on skeletal class III bases with varying vertical facial patterns.
interventionsSurgical planning incorporated advanced 3D technologies, including multi-slice computed tomography and computer-aided design, to customize surgical movements and fabricate splints via digital light processing 3D printing. OUTCOMES: Postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in facial aesthetics, occlusion, and skeletal symmetry. Class I occlusion with aligned dental midlines was achieved in all patients. Although slight reductions in upper airway volume were noted in 2 cases, no functional impairments or obstructive sleep apnea symptoms occurred. The use of 3D-printed splints facilitated accurate surgical execution, particularly in complex movements requiring multi-plane adjustments. LESSONS: This case series highlights the benefits of integrating 3D printing technology with digital surgical planning to enhance precision, efficiency, and clinical outcomes in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. The findings emphasize the importance of combining advanced fabrication methods with tailored treatment protocols to achieve functional and aesthetic goals in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.