Observational studyMedicine2025
SWOT analysis of prehospital ultrasound use and its practical implications.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) associated with prehospital ultrasound (US) use by paramedics and to explore its practical implications in emergency medical services. A structured, semiquantitative approach was employed, involving literature screening from 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline) and synthesis via thematic content analysis, semiotic coding, and SWOT framework. Studies focusing on field use of US by paramedics were included. Predefined thematic indicators were applied to classify data into SWOT domains, and frequency analysis was used to identify prevailing patterns and trends. Among strengths, early diagnosis was most frequently reported (62.5%), followed by accurate intervention (25.0%) and diagnostic-guided treatment planning (12.5%). Weaknesses included limited training and experience (58.33%) and technical/device constraints (25.0%). Opportunities centered around digital education (54.17%) and emerging portable technologies (25.0%). Misdiagnosis (45.83%) and incomplete interventions (37.5%) were noted as key threats. Prehospital US performed by trained paramedics shows clear strengths in enabling early diagnosis and time-critical decision-making, but its scale-up is limited by insufficient longitudinal training/exposure and the absence of standardized implementation protocols. Opportunities include blended/digital education, tele-US supervision, and robust quality assurance and image archiving; the principal threat is misdiagnosis under real-world operational constraints, with downstream risks for triage and interventions. These findings support implementing structured, condition-specific longitudinal training, service-wide protocols with defined roles and maintenance accountability, and standardized equipment - priorities that future multicenter studies should link to patient-oriented outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.