ArticleMedicine2025
Absence of bidirectional causality between primary biliary cholangitis and major depression: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a growing body of evidence suggesting an association between primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and depression, the relationship between the 2 diseases remains to be elucidated due to the limitations of observational studies. Our study aims to clarify the causal relationship between these 2 diseases. We conducted a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genetic variant data for PBC and major depression (MD) from the genome-wide association studies catalog. The genome-wide association studies dataset for PBC includes 8021 cases, while that for MD comprises 170,756 cases. We selected instrumental variables (IVs) that met criteria for strong association, independence from confounding factors, and plausible causal pathways. We employed the inverse variance weighting method, supplemented by MR-Egger regression and the weighted median approach, to ensure robustness against potential violations of the IV assumptions. The strength of the association between IVs and the exposure was measured using R2 values and F-statistics, and heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were rigorously assessed to ensure the reliability of the results. The sum R2 values for IV-exposure associations were 10.3733% for PBC and 0.1555% for MD. The F-statistics were all >10. The number of valid IVs exceeded 20. All MR methods indicated no causal relationship between MD and PBC (inverse variance weighting: MD on PBC odds ratio = 1.2168, 95% confidence interval: 0.8356-1.7718, P = .31; PBC on MD odds ratio = 1.0067, 95% confidence interval: 0.9989-1.0145, P = .09). Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were not detected (P > .05). Our study is the first to investigate the causal relationship between MD and PBC using MR analysis. The results of our study indicate that there is no significant causal relationship between MD and PBC. Despite null genetic causality, depression screening in PBC remains clinically warranted due to symptom burden. Future studies should consider broader populations to address the limitations of our European-only data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.