Trial reportMedicine2025
Clinical and radiological assessment of grape seed extract versus mineral trioxide aggregates in primary molar pulpotomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Calcium-Silicate-Based Materials in Primary-Tooth Pulpotomy: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ginger (Zingiber officinale): An effective remedy for electronic cigarettes nicotine toxicity on dorsal tongue filiform and fungiform papillae.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the radiological and clinical outcomes of mineral trioxide aggregates (MTA) versus grape seed extract (GSE) when used as a dressing material in primary teeth undergoing pulpotomy.
methodsThis was a prospective split-mouth randomized clinical study. A total of 32 primary teeth were included and split into 2 groups: MTA was used in group I, and GSE was used in group II. A clinical and radiographic follow-up was conducted for 6 months postoperatively. Periapical radiographs were taken for all treated teeth at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Radiographic criteria for clinical success included absence of internal resorption, pathologic external resorption, interradicular radiolucency, periapical radiolucency, and widening of the periodontal ligament space.
resultIn the MTA group, clinical and radiographic success was 100% at 1 and 3 months, in comparison to 93.75% 6 months postoperatively. In the GSE group, clinical success was 100% 1 month, and 93.75% 3 and 6 months postoperatively, while radiographic success was 100% at 3 months, 87.5% 6 months postoperatively. There were no significant statistical differences in the overall clinical or radiographic outcomes between the study groups (P > .05).
conclusionBoth MTA and GSE are associated with successful clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomy; however, MTA seems to be associated with reduced inflammatory reactions, rendering it more effective than GSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.