ArticleJournal of food science2025
Consumer Perception of Plant-Based Cheese.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Environmental, Nutritional, and Animal Welfare Labeling of Plant-Based Cream Cheese on Consumer Perception.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- A Sustainable Approach for the Use of Plant Proteins as Functional Ingredients in Dairy Alternatives.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-based dairy alternatives have been an increasing trend among consumers, with plant-based milk being the most profitable and rapidly growing dairy alternative. Plant-based cheese (PBC), however, has recently remained static. The objectives of this study were to determine purchase motivations, consumer acceptance, and areas for improvement for Cheddar and mozzarella-style PBC. An online survey was conducted with consumers of dairy cheese (DC) and PBC (n = 311). Subsequently, consumer acceptance testing was conducted with both plant-based Cheddar-style cheese (n = 105) and plant-based mozzarella-style cheese (n = 117). Two days of testing were dedicated to each PBC style, consumers evaluated the shreds cold (as-is) on the first day and melted on the second day. The online survey consisted of a maximum difference (MXD) scaling, agreement questions, and an ingredient list activity. Consumer acceptance testing utilized liking and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Conceptually, flavor, texture, ingredients, and protein content were the most important attributes for PBC purchase. A short ingredient list was preferred. Dairy cheese (DC) was perceived as superior in flavor and texture, while PBC was perceived as more sustainable, more ethical, and healthier. Both products were perceived as equally nutritious. Cheesy, creamy, buttery, and soft were desirable attributes when served cold and melted for both PB styles. Undesirable attributes for both styles when evaluated cold included gritty, rubbery, artificial, and off flavor. During the melted evaluation (both styles), artificial and off flavors were undesirable. Two major pain points remain for the PBC market: flavor and texture. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Flavor and texture, both cold and hot, remain challenges for Cheddar and mozzarella-style plant-based cheeses. Understanding consumer perceptions of plant-based cheeses can aid in the development of products that meet consumer expectations and desires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.