ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Galleria mellonella as a Simple Yet Reliable In Vivo Model for Nanotoxicology: Techniques and Applications.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lignin Nanoparticles Containing Cobalt-Cyanine Complexes: Potential Multifunctional Platforms for Photoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal Treatment of Bacterial Biofilms in Chronic Wounds.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Galleria mellonella as a Simple Yet Reliable In Vivo Model for Nanotoxicology: Techniques and Applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomaterials are a rapidly advancing tool with applications across various scientific fields. However, their interactions with living organisms have raised numerous safety concerns, making it crucial to develop reliable models to predict and evaluate associated toxicity effects. Traditional in vitro assays fail to mimic the true physiological responses of living organisms to nanomaterials, whereas murine and other in vivo models are time-consuming, costly, and ethically controversial. The greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, has emerged as a promising in vivo model for nanotoxicology, serving as an effective bridge between in vitro and in vivo mammalian testing. This model combines simplicity and ethical viability with a human-conserved innate immune system, making it ideal for immunotoxicity testing. While it cannot fully replace more complex animal models, G. mellonella represents a valuable alternative for early-stage nanotoxicology screening and deserves greater recognition and integration into toxicological research. In this review, we examine all the methodologies and applications of G. mellonella in nanotoxicological studies, highlighting its potential as a reliable and ethical model for assessing nanomaterial safety. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.