Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028962›Full record

SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2026

Pregnancy as a risk factor for central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nathalie Skovgaard Eriksen, Zainab Fakhril-Din, Riccardo Fasana, Rodrigo Anguita, Elon H C van Dijk, Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Jakob Grauslund, Michael Stormly Hansen, Oliver Niels Klefter, Armin Motaabbed and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nathalie Skovgaard EriksenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Zainab Fakhril-DinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Riccardo FasanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2670-483X
Rodrigo AnguitaMoorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Elon H C van DijkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lorenzo Ferro DesideriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0715-6369
Jakob GrauslundDepartment of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Michael Stormly HansenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-7455
Oliver Niels KlefterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Armin MotaabbedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Line PetersenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-2650
Prithvi RamtohulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Mehmet Cem SabanerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bilecik Training and Research Hospital, Bilecik, Türkiye.
Osman SavranDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Miklos SchneiderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-4743
Yousif SubhiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePregnancy induces significant changes in the body, including increased peripheral and choroidal blood perfusion and an increased systemic corticosteroid level. Here, we systematically reviewed the evidence on pregnancy as a risk factor for developing central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and conducted a meta-analysis to obtain a summary estimate.

methodsWe searched 12 literature databases on 16 February 2025 for epidemiological studies, which evaluated the potential association between pregnancy and CSC. All eligible studies were included for a qualitative review and a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was made using the random-effects model on the odds ratio (OR) of the association between pregnancy and CSC.

resultsFour studies were eligible for our review. Of the 2766 individuals (1345 patients with CSC, 1391 controls) in these studies, females constituted 26%-64% of study populations in individual studies. The calculated summary estimate of pregnancy as a risk factor for CSC was OR 5.51 (95% CI: 2.12-14.30, p = 0.00046). Heterogeneity statistics suggested minimal to no heterogeneity (Cochran's Q = 0.72; I

conclusionPregnancy appears to be a significant risk factor for CSC.

Indexed as

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansPregnancyRisk Factorscentral serous chorioretinopathymeta‐analysispregnancyrisk factorsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41028962
PMCPMC13058684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.