Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of 3D-printed Ti-MXene incorporated chitosan/HAP nano-composite soft-bone scaffold and its mechanical, anti-biofilm and cell-viability studies.

Ashwin Veerabathiran, Ashok Kumar Subramania, Mowsam Saikia, T S Manikandamaharaj, Saradh Prasad Rajendra, Ramesh Duraisamy, Subramania Angaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MXene Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: Design and Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashwin VeerabathiranElectro-Materials Research Laboratory, Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605 014, India.
Ashok Kumar SubramaniaSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Mowsam SaikiaElectro-Materials Research Laboratory, Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605 014, India.
T S ManikandamaharajXenobiomic Research and Technological Development Pvt Ltd, Puducherry, 605 010, India.
Saradh Prasad RajendraDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Ramesh DuraisamyDepartment of Chemistry, College of Natural & Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. ramesh.duraisamy@amu.edu.et.
Subramania AngaiahElectro-Materials Research Laboratory, Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605 014, India. a.subramania@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0855-752X

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project RSPD2025R723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevailing scientific literature suggests that implantable plates demand resurgery, and it will result in corrosion behaviour and the formation of biofilm on the scaffold by Staphylococcus aureus, which is capable of causing a bone surgery-related detrimental effect in two-thirds of the people suffering from osteomyelitis diseases. The development of a nanocomposite scaffold by 3D-bioprinting to improve potent mechanical features with substantial biological characteristics. By incorporating hydroxyapatite (10% w/v) into chitosan (10% w/v) at 1:1 ratio mimicking the natural structure of soft bone tissue. Furthermore, a better structural hydrogel was synthesized for 3D bio-printing through the incorporation of Ti-MXene into the Chitosan/Hydroxyapatite nanocomposite at two distinct ratios. Apart from this, 0.3 mg/mL of Ti-MXene containing 3D-printed nanocomposite scaffold revealed better structural morphology with very less biofilm formation when compared to other 3D-printed scaffolds. Furthermore, mechanical testing such as tensile revealed 23.3 MPa for 0.3 mg/mL of Ti-MXene incorporated Chitosan/HAP nanocomposite. Additionally, this scaffold exhibits a favorable contact angle (74.70°) with a low swelling ratio (27.6%) and degradation rate (1.1%). Further, an in-vitro cell viability test showed a higher cell attachment without cell death. These results find the absence of toxic effect and suggest an enhancement in cell attachment.

Indexed as

BiofilmsChitosanDurapatiteNanocompositesPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsTitaniumBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesCell SurvivalHumansMaterials TestingNitritesStaphylococcus aureusTissue EngineeringTransition ElementsBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanDurapatiteMXeneNitritesTitaniumTransition Elements3D-printingBiofilmCell viability testChitosanHydroxyapatiteSoft bone scaffold

Identifiers

PMID41028885
PMCPMC12484617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.