ArticleScientific reports2025
Manufacturing and characterization of innovative lightweight wooden furniture from polystyrene core wood sandwich panels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing demand for lightweight and sustainable furniture has highlighted the need for innovative materials with improved performance characteristics. In this study, a light wood sandwich panel (HM) was produced by incorporating polystyrene cores, and lightweight furniture was manufactured using these panels. The primary objective was to develop alternative lightweight materials for furniture production and to perform a comparative analysis of the physical and mechanical properties of HM, medium density fiberboard (MDF), and particleboard (PB). Physical and mechanical characterization tests, including swelling, water absorption, internal bonding strength, screw withdrawal force, and modulus of rupture, were conducted on HM boards and compared with MDF and PB. Results showed that HM boards were 77% lighter than MDF and 16% lighter than PB. HM exhibited the lowest swelling and water absorption values and the highest internal bonding strength among the tested materials. However, the screw withdrawal force and modulus of rupture of HM were lower than those of MDF and PB. Despite these limitations, HM panels demonstrated superior lightweight characteristics and high water resistance. Further improvements in mechanical properties are possible through the use of stronger adhesives and fastening techniques. Overall, the findings indicate that HM panels offer a promising alternative for lightweight furniture production, potentially reducing wood consumption and production costs, while creating more ergonomic products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.