ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning analysis for hybrid nanofluid flow between two co-axial cylinders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates steady, incompressible, heat transfer and axisymmetric flow in a hybrid nanofluid, magnetite and multi-walled carbon nanotubes dispersed in water, confined in the annular space between two coaxial cylinders (outer radius normalized to 1, inner radius one quarter of outer). The outer cylinder rotates while a constant radial magnetic field is applied, and the hybrid mixture's effective thermophysical properties are evaluated using a two-step Hamilton-Crosser mixing model. The governing boundary-value problem is solved numerically with MATLAB's bvp4c solver, and a Levenberg-Marquardt trained artificial neural network is developed for rapid prediction and validation. A dataset of [Formula: see text] radial sample points (range [Formula: see text], step [Formula: see text]) is used, with [Formula: see text] for training, remainder split equally for validation and testing. Results show that increasing magnetic strength suppresses velocity while raising the temperature through enhanced viscous and Joule heating; increasing the Brinkman number likewise increases temperature, and higher Reynolds number raises the pressure gradient. The hybrid nanofluid yields larger wall shear stress and, on average, about 7.09% higher heat transfer compared with the single-particle nanofluid. The neural network reproduces bvp4c solutions with excellent fidelity (validation mean squared errors down to the 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.