ArticleScientific reports2025
An MADM approach for the assessment of eye lenses with fuzziness of using prioritized weighted operators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The choice of lens impacts the quality of vision, comfort, and overall eye health. By correcting vision problems such as astigmatism, nearsightedness, or farsightedness, the right lens can guarantee precise and clear vision. The multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) technique is a valuable method for data aggregation with accuracy. The central theme of this article is to develop novel aggregation operators (AOs) by giving a positive value called the priority degree under a strict priority level. We establish a novel MADM method based on an interval-valued t-spherical fuzzy set (IV-TSFS) framework and the Einstein AOs. First, we established Einstein t-norm (TNM) and t-conorm (TCNM) operations based on the IV-TSFS framework. Next, we proposed new prioritized AOs, such as IV-TSF Einstein prioritized weighted averaging (IV-TSFEPWA), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized ordered weighted averaging (IV-TSFEPOWA), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized hybrid weighted averaging (IV-TSFEPHWA), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized weighted geometric (IV-TSFEPWG), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized ordered weighted geometric (IV-TSFEPOWG), and IV-TSF Einstein prioritized hybrid weighted geometric (IV-TSFEPHWG). Some essential axioms, such as boundedness, idempotency, and monotonicity, were also discussed. Then, we developed the MADM algorithm based on the IV-TSFEPWA and IV-TSFEPWG operators, which was monitored through a real-life case study on the selection of optimal eye lens manufacturing companies based on prioritized evaluation criteria. Additionally, to validate the novelty of the established model, a comparative study with existing approach is also provided, highlighting the applicability of the established work. Ultimately, the practical implications of established AOs and solid conclusions will be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.