Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028825›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An MADM approach for the assessment of eye lenses with fuzziness of using prioritized weighted operators.

Chengli Hu, Faizan Pervaiz, Jing Zhang, Kifayat Ullah, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Ali Raza, Zeeshan Ali, Shi Yin, Hanen Karamti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chengli HuBusiness School, Taishan University, Tai'an, 271000, China.
Faizan PervaizDepartment of Computer Science, Sialkot College of Physical Therapy, Sialkot, 51310, Pakistan.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Business Management, Chengde College of Applied Technology, Chengde, 067000, China. zjfeng201710@163.com.
Kifayat UllahDepartment of Mathematics, Riphah International University Lahore, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rizwan KhanDepartment of Mathematics, Riphah International University Lahore, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Ali RazaDepartment of Mathematics, Riphah International University Lahore, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan. zeeshanalinsr@gmail.com.
Zeeshan AliDepartment of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Yunlin, Taiwan, ROC.
Shi YinCollege of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China. shyshi0314@163.com.
Hanen KaramtiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O.Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of lens impacts the quality of vision, comfort, and overall eye health. By correcting vision problems such as astigmatism, nearsightedness, or farsightedness, the right lens can guarantee precise and clear vision. The multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) technique is a valuable method for data aggregation with accuracy. The central theme of this article is to develop novel aggregation operators (AOs) by giving a positive value called the priority degree under a strict priority level. We establish a novel MADM method based on an interval-valued t-spherical fuzzy set (IV-TSFS) framework and the Einstein AOs. First, we established Einstein t-norm (TNM) and t-conorm (TCNM) operations based on the IV-TSFS framework. Next, we proposed new prioritized AOs, such as IV-TSF Einstein prioritized weighted averaging (IV-TSFEPWA), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized ordered weighted averaging (IV-TSFEPOWA), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized hybrid weighted averaging (IV-TSFEPHWA), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized weighted geometric (IV-TSFEPWG), IV-TSF Einstein prioritized ordered weighted geometric (IV-TSFEPOWG), and IV-TSF Einstein prioritized hybrid weighted geometric (IV-TSFEPHWG). Some essential axioms, such as boundedness, idempotency, and monotonicity, were also discussed. Then, we developed the MADM algorithm based on the IV-TSFEPWA and IV-TSFEPWG operators, which was monitored through a real-life case study on the selection of optimal eye lens manufacturing companies based on prioritized evaluation criteria. Additionally, to validate the novelty of the established model, a comparative study with existing approach is also provided, highlighting the applicability of the established work. Ultimately, the practical implications of established AOs and solid conclusions will be discussed.

Indexed as

Aggregation operatorsEinstein t-Norm and t-ConormInterval-valued T-spherical fuzzy setMulti attribute decision makingPrioritized degree

Identifiers

PMID41028825
PMCPMC12484623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.