ArticleScientific reports2025
Micro-level vulnerability assessment among agricultural communities of District Kupwara, Kashmir Himalaya.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Livelihood and food security are pressing issues for mountain communities, particularly in the ecologically fragile and data-deficient regions of the Kashmir Himalaya. This study evaluates the inherent vulnerability of agricultural communities at the village level in Kupwara district using an indicator-based approach. A total of 356 villages were assessed using ecological and socioeconomic indicators of sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, collected from secondary sources. These indicators were standardized, weighted using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and aggregated into composite indices for comparative analysis. Results show that 117 villages (33.14%) fall under high and 7 villages (1.96%) under very high vulnerability, while 211 villages are moderately vulnerable and over 90% of villages face moderate to high vulnerability. A comprehensive vulnerability gap and severity analysis was conducted, where the gap indicates the shortfall in adaptive capacity and severity measures potential damage. Village Hayihama emerged as highly sensitive, with a vulnerability gap of - 0.00893 and severity of 0.00312. The Kalrooch block had the highest severity, averaging a gap of - 0.00506 and severity of 0.00327. The research aims to guide policymakers by providing a robust framework to assess vulnerability, integrate risk perceptions into governance, and enhance resilience and adaptive capacity in farming communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.