ArticleScientific reports2025
Automating prostate volume acquisition using abdominal ultrasound scans for prostate-specific antigen density calculations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Object detection as an aid for locating the prostate in surface-based abdominal ultrasound images.Communications engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proposed methods for prostate cancer screening are currently prohibitively expensive (due to the high costs of imaging equipment such as magnetic resonance imaging and traditional ultrasound systems), inadequate in their detection rates, require highly trained specialists, and/or are invasive, resulting in patient discomfort. These limitations make population-wide screening for prostate cancer challenging. Machine learning techniques applied to abdominal ultrasound scanning may help alleviate some of these disadvantages. Abdominal ultrasound scans are comparatively low cost and exhibit minimal patient discomfort, and machine learning can be applied to mitigate against the high operator-dependent variability of ultrasound scanning. In this study, a state-of-the-art machine learning model was compared to an expert radiologist and trainee radiologist registrars of varying experience when estimating prostate volume from abdominal ultrasound images, a crucial step in detecting prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen density. The machine learning model calculated prostatic volume by marking out dimensions of the prolate ellipsoid formula from two orthogonal images of the prostate acquired with abdominal ultrasound scans (which could be conducted by operators with minimal experience in a primary care setting). While both the algorithm and the registrars showed high correlation with the expert ([Formula: see text]) it was found that the model outperformed the trainees in both accuracy (lowest average volume error of [Formula: see text]) and consistency (lowest IQR of [Formula: see text] and lowest average volume standard deviation of [Formula: see text]). The results are promising for the future development of an automated prostate cancer screening workflow using machine learning and abdominal ultrasound scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.