ArticleScientific data2025
A longitudinal dataset of tile and corresponding dermoscopic images with metadata for identifying skin cancers.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in three-dimensional total-body photography for skin cancer surveillance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A longitudinal dataset of tile and corresponding dermoscopic images with metadata for identifying skin cancers.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning classification algorithms have emerged as promising tools to support the early detection of skin cancers. Existing algorithms typically assess malignancy of skin lesions based on a single skin image. This is in contrast with how clinicians integrate information from their physical examination, comparing multiple skin lesions of an individual and changes in lesions over time. Including contextual information could greatly enhance machine learning algorithms. However, contextual information in skin image datasets is predominantly scarce and inconsistent. Additionally, a dataset containing images of the same lesion across multiple time points and varying resolutions is also lacking. To address these gaps, we present a comprehensive dataset derived from skin monitoring of 480 study participants recruited from a general population sample (n = 196) and a high-risk for melanoma cohort (n = 284). This dataset includes images of 250,162 skin lesions obtained from three-dimensional total body imaging (tile images), along with corresponding dermoscopic images of 9,389 lesions. For 340 of the participants, longitudinal tile and dermoscopic images (ranging from 2 to 7) are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.