Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028759›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A longitudinal dataset of tile and corresponding dermoscopic images with metadata for identifying skin cancers.

Nima Ghahari, Liam Caffery, Brigid Betz-Stablein, Adam Mothershaw, Dilki Jayasinghe, Clare Primiero, Shekhar S Chandra, Joachim Torrano, H Peter Soyer, Monika Janda

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nima GhahariCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. n.ghahari@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2370-3046
Liam CafferyCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-7534
Brigid Betz-StableinCanfield Scientific, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3876-501X
Adam MothershawCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-8187
Dilki JayasingheCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-7664
Clare PrimieroFrazer Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2944-0013
Shekhar S ChandraSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-900X
Joachim TorranoFrazer Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-5621
H Peter SoyerFrazer Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4770-561X
Monika JandaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. m.janda@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1728-8085

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1137127Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP2006551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning classification algorithms have emerged as promising tools to support the early detection of skin cancers. Existing algorithms typically assess malignancy of skin lesions based on a single skin image. This is in contrast with how clinicians integrate information from their physical examination, comparing multiple skin lesions of an individual and changes in lesions over time. Including contextual information could greatly enhance machine learning algorithms. However, contextual information in skin image datasets is predominantly scarce and inconsistent. Additionally, a dataset containing images of the same lesion across multiple time points and varying resolutions is also lacking. To address these gaps, we present a comprehensive dataset derived from skin monitoring of 480 study participants recruited from a general population sample (n = 196) and a high-risk for melanoma cohort (n = 284). This dataset includes images of 250,162 skin lesions obtained from three-dimensional total body imaging (tile images), along with corresponding dermoscopic images of 9,389 lesions. For 340 of the participants, longitudinal tile and dermoscopic images (ranging from 2 to 7) are provided.

Indexed as

DermoscopyMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMetadata

Identifiers

PMID41028759
PMCPMC12484743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.