Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028737›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The reliability of satellite precipitation estimates during tropical cyclone Shaheen.

Badriya Al Mawali, Alaa Ibrahim, Sultan Al Yahyai, Isam Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Badriya Al MawaliPhysics Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Alaa IbrahimPhysics Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. aiibrahim@squ.edu.om.
Sultan Al YahyaiComputer Science Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Isam AliPhysics Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events worldwide, amplifying the global need for reliable weather prediction. Cyclones and flash floods pose serious threats to human life and infrastructure, with advance forecasts and flash flood guidance provided by numerical weather models for disaster mitigation. These models depend on data from satellites and/or ground instruments. In the greater part of the world, less industrialized countries rely widely on the free ubiquitous satellite data, amid limited availability of rain gauges and radars. Assessing the reliability of satellite data during an extreme event in diverse geographic regions is therefore vital. Here we present the assessment of satellite rainfall estimates during tropical cyclone Shaheen, which hit the Arabian Sea and the Arabian Peninsula, in particular, Oman, where flash flood prediction is highly dependent on the MWGHE satellite estimator. We show that satellite data overestimate gauge cumulative precipitation, with daily totals showing a consistent positive bias. Six-hourly analysis reveals fluctuations, with overestimation varying by intensity and timing. Comparisons with UAE radar observations further highlight these discrepancies, particularly in the spatial distribution and intensity of precipitation. Our study underscores the need for a full range of products and/or enhancements of current satellite estimators.

Indexed as

EvaluationHydro-estimatorMicrowavePrecipitationRadarRain gaugeShaheen

Identifiers

PMID41028737
PMCPMC12484739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.