Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028732›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

The interplay of DNA damage, epigenetics and tumour heterogeneity in driving cancer cell fitness.

Celia D Rouault, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Christophe Ginestier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Celia D RouaultCRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, Epithelial Stem Cells and Cancer Lab, Equipe labellisée LIGUE contre le cancer, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7024-0733
Emmanuelle Charafe-JauffretCRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, Epithelial Stem Cells and Cancer Lab, Equipe labellisée LIGUE contre le cancer, Marseille, France. charafee@ipc.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-1299
Christophe GinestierCRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, Epithelial Stem Cells and Cancer Lab, Equipe labellisée LIGUE contre le cancer, Marseille, France. christophe.ginestier@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-3837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-tumor heterogeneity is a primary cause of therapeutic failure, driving tumor progression. Within tumors, diverse cell states coexist, maintained by a specific chromatin landscape that influences various cell functions, including cancer stemness. Among factors that induce chromatin changes affecting cell state fitness, DNA damage and its repair have emerged as significant contributors. This perspective examines recent advances that elucidate the interplay between DNA repair, epigenome, and cell plasticity. We discuss how epigenome affects DNA repair and, conversely, how DNA repair-induced chromatin changes influence cell plasticity. Finally, we discuss emerging concepts and highlight the therapeutic implications of these interconnected mechanisms.

Indexed as

DNA DamageEpigenesis, GeneticNeoplasmsAnimalsCell PlasticityChromatinDNA RepairGenetic HeterogeneityHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID41028732
PMCPMC12484684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.