Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028672›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Analysis of risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with an emphasis on age and sex differences: A nationwide population-based study.

Jae Yong Park, Mi-Sook Kim, Beom Jin Kim, Jae Gyu Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jae Yong Park *Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Sook Kim *Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Biomedical Research Institution, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Beom Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea.
Jae Gyu KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea. jgkimd@cau.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4841-9404

Funding

Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research KCHUGR-201902502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been increasingly performed in elderly patients. However, bleeding remains a major complication. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the risk factors of post-procedural bleeding, focusing on age and sex differences.

methodsThis was a nationwide, population-based, retrospective study utilizing the Korean NHIS database, comprising patients who underwent gastric ESD from November 2011 to December 2022. Operational definitions were created to identify the target population and post-procedural bleeding within 30 days. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for bleeding. The variables comprehensively included basic demographic factors, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, medication usage, and lifestyle behaviors.

results7825 bleeding events occurred in 164,968 procedures. In multiple logistic regression, significant risk factors included young age, male sex, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), gastric cancer, multiple lesions, several comorbidities (highest aOR for renal failure undergoing hemodialysis) and antithrombotic agents (highest aOR for warfarin), underweight, current smoking, and heavy drinking. Being overweight and obese, however, showed a protective effect. Certain variables impacted bleeding risk differently based on age and sex. In the elderly group, high CCI and DOAC use were more influential, while male sex, smoking, and drinking had a diminished effect. Sex differences were more pronounced in the non-elderly group, with gastric cancer, warfarin use, and heavy drinking having a greater impact, while SES and obesity offered stronger protection in females.

conclusionsThis study identified risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and highlighted the role of age and sex in risk stratification and personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionGastroscopyPostoperative HemorrhageStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsBleedingElderlyEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastric cancerRisk factorsSex differences

Identifiers

PMID41028672
PMCPMC12708754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.