ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Analysis of risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with an emphasis on age and sex differences: A nationwide population-based study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot study on the efficacy of cyanoacrylate glue in preventing post-ESD bleeding at the gastric angle.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Establishment and validation of a predictive scoring system for titanium clip retention at six months after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea: Results From the Korean College ofJournal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Korea: Results From the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research (KCHUGR) 2023 Survey.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Article
- Predicting post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer: an explainable model based on endoscopic features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been increasingly performed in elderly patients. However, bleeding remains a major complication. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the risk factors of post-procedural bleeding, focusing on age and sex differences.
methodsThis was a nationwide, population-based, retrospective study utilizing the Korean NHIS database, comprising patients who underwent gastric ESD from November 2011 to December 2022. Operational definitions were created to identify the target population and post-procedural bleeding within 30 days. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for bleeding. The variables comprehensively included basic demographic factors, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, medication usage, and lifestyle behaviors.
results7825 bleeding events occurred in 164,968 procedures. In multiple logistic regression, significant risk factors included young age, male sex, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), gastric cancer, multiple lesions, several comorbidities (highest aOR for renal failure undergoing hemodialysis) and antithrombotic agents (highest aOR for warfarin), underweight, current smoking, and heavy drinking. Being overweight and obese, however, showed a protective effect. Certain variables impacted bleeding risk differently based on age and sex. In the elderly group, high CCI and DOAC use were more influential, while male sex, smoking, and drinking had a diminished effect. Sex differences were more pronounced in the non-elderly group, with gastric cancer, warfarin use, and heavy drinking having a greater impact, while SES and obesity offered stronger protection in females.
conclusionsThis study identified risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and highlighted the role of age and sex in risk stratification and personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.