Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028662›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2025

Sleeve Plus Procedures: A Review of Technical Evolution Along a Schematic Diagram.

Yasunori Kurahashi, Yudai Hojo, Hisashi Shinohara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasunori KurahashiHyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan. kurahashi@hyo-med.ac.jp.
Yudai HojoHyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Hisashi ShinoharaHyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most widely accepted bariatric and metabolic surgeries, but each has its respective drawbacks. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has the important limitation of hindering surveillance of the gastric remnant in addition to common drawbacks of bypass procedures. SG is generally safe and effective, but its limitations include reduced efficacy compared to RYGB, long-term recurrent weight gain, and diabetes recurrence. This has led to the development of sleeve plus procedures that combine SG with bypass techniques. This review presents these procedures along a schematic diagram, illustrating the characteristics of each technique, and categorizing them by the type of bypass technique used, length of the food pathway, and the inclusion of duodenal diversion.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrectomyGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidHumansTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric and metabolic surgeriesSleeve gastrectomySleeve plus procedure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.