ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Impact of Australian home medicines reviews on continuous polypharmacy and associated costs among older women: a cohort study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedication misadventure is associated with the use of polypharmacy and is highly prevalent in the older population living in the community, especially among women.
aimThis study aimed to determine the impact of Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) on continuous polypharmacy, the prevalence of continuous polypharmacy, and inflation-adjusted differences in costs among women who did and did not receive HMRs.
methodThe study included 9347 participants from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health who fulfilled the eligibility criteria from 77-82 years in 2003 to 91-96 years in 2017. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate the association between HMRs and continuous polypharmacy. Out-of-pocket costs and benefits paid to government were presented as median costs for each participant from 2003 to 2017, alongside interquartile ranges.
resultsOnly a small percentage of women received HMRs in 2003 (1.14%) but this percentage increased over time to 2017 (3.95%). The prevalence of continuous polypharmacy in 2017 was 39.06% amongst women who received an HMR and 28.05% amongst women who did not receive an HMR. There was evidence for an association between the use of HMRs and continuous polypharmacy in the following calendar year (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.03, 1.21). There was an increase in out-of-pocket (OOP) medication costs in both women with and without HMRs, with the HMR group demonstrating higher OOP medication costs (AUD$26 to AUD$57) than the non-HMR group (AUD$22 to AUD$50).
conclusionHMRs were associated with a modest increase in the odds of continuous polypharmacy in the subsequent year. Increase in OOP medication costs over time highlights the need to further optimise cost-effective medications for individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41028658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.