Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028653›Full record

ReviewDrugs2025

Advances in Pharmacotherapy for Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms.

Stephanie Young Moss, Angie Lee, James A Simon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie Young MossMenopause in Color, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Angie LeeBayer US LLC, Whippany, NJ, USA.
James A SimonGeorge Washington University, IntimMedicine Specialists®, Washington, DC, USA. jsimon@intimmedicine.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are considered the cardinal symptoms of menopause, affecting up to 80% of American women at some point during the menopausal transition. VMS, particularly if they are moderate to severe, frequent, or cause sleep disturbances, can have a negative impact on a woman's quality of life, physical and mental health, and professional life. Furthermore, VMS have been associated with negative health outcomes, including an increased risk of coronary heart disease and cognitive impairment. Menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) is supported by level 1 evidence and can address many of the negative impacts associated with menopause, including VMS. However, not all women can take MHT (owing to having contraindications to their use) or choose not to take MHT. In addition to MHT, non-hormonal therapy options, which include neurokinin (NK)-targeted therapies, are also available. Fezolinetant (NK3 receptor antagonist) and the newly approved elinzanetant (NK1 and NK3 receptor antagonist) are non-hormonal treatment options approved for the treatment of VMS associated with menopause. These approvals expand the treatment options for women. A number of investigational agents are currently in phase 2 trials for potential future use for VMS; these include Q-122, PhytoSERM, NOE-115, GS1-144, and HS-10384. In this review, we highlight the recent advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of VMS and consider the current, new, and investigational treatment options for the treatment of VMS.

Indexed as

Hot FlashesMenopauseVasomotor SystemFemaleHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41028653
PMCPMC12572072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.