Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028623›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Isolation of Distinct Populations of Enteric Glia from the Muscularis Externa and Mucosa of the Mouse Intestine.

Anoohya N Muppirala, Meenakshi Rao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anoohya N MuppiralaDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Meenakshi RaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Meenakshi.Rao@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric glia, integral to the enteric nervous system (ENS), are crucial for intestinal motility, secretomotor function, and immunity. These glia occupy diverse niches from the serosa to the lumen, yet their transcriptional diversity across these compartments remains incompletely understood. Traditionally, studies on enteric glia have mostly focused on the myenteric plexus, omitting the large populations of glia located in the circular muscle and mucosa. Here, we present a method to rapidly isolate enteric glia from the muscularis externa and mucosal compartments of the mouse intestine in tandem, allowing direct comparative and compartment-specific analyses of each population. This protocol circumvents the need for traditional and labor-intensive longitudinal muscle myenteric plexus (LMMP) peeled tissue preparations by enabling rapid cell isolation suitable for many downstream applications, ranging from transcriptional profiling to cell culture. We detail a protocol for mechanically separating adult small intestinal layers, dissociating cells from the mucosal and muscularis compartments, and sorting these cells by flow cytometry. This method is applicable to both small and large intestines and has been validated in mice from weaning to adulthood. The ability to isolate distinct populations of enteric glia will enable functional interrogation of their niche-specific roles, advancing our understanding of their diverse contributions to ENS biology and pathology.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationEnteric Nervous SystemIntestinal MucosaMuscle, SmoothNeurogliaAnimalsFlow CytometryMiceMyenteric PlexusEnteric gliaEnteric nervous systemGlial cell isolation protocolIntramuscular gliaMucosal gliaMuscularis glia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.